| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A0224C94A@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:32:42 -0700 From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com> To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, "Chris Snook" <csnook@...hat.com> Cc: "Andreas Schwab" <schwab@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <ak@...e.de>, <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <wensong@...ux-vs.org>, <horms@...ge.net.au>, <wjiang@...ilience.com>, <cfriesen@...tel.com>, <zlynx@....org>, <rpjday@...dspring.com>, <jesper.juhl@...il.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on ia64 > Here are the functions in which they occur in the object file. You > may have to chase down some inlining to find the function that > actually uses atomic_*(). Ignore this ... Andreas' patch was only two lines so I thought I'd "save time" by just hand-editing the source over on my build machine. I managed to goof that by editing the wrong function for one of the cases. :-( New result. With Andreas's patch correctly applied, the generated vmlinux is identical with/without your patch. -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists