[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708092045120.27164@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 20:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Daniel Phillips <daniel.raymond.phillips@...il.com>
cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> If you believe that the deadlock problems we address here can be
> better fixed by making reclaim more intelligent then please post a
> patch and we will test it. I am highly skeptical, but the proof is in
> the patch.
Then please test the patch that I posted here earlier to reclaim even if
PF_MEMALLOC is set. It may require some fixups but it should address your
issues in most vm load situations.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists