[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BBE6D9.1080904@tmr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:17:29 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: richard kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, miklos@...redi.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de, dgc@....com,
tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
Andi Kleen wrote:
> richard kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk> writes:
>> This is on a standard desktop machine so there are lots of other
>> processes running on it, and although there is a degree of variability
>> in the numbers,they are very repeatable and your patch always out
>> performs the stock mm2.
>> looks good to me
>
> iirc the goal of this is less to get better performance, but to avoid long user visible
> latencies. Of course if it's faster it's great too, but that's only secondary.
>
What a trade-off, if you want to get rid of long latency you have to
live with better throughput. I can live with that. ;-)
Your point well taken, not the intent of the patch, but it may indicate
where a performance bottleneck happens as well.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists