[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070810054948.GA5908@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:49:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFS review
* Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > 4544 roman 20 0 1796 520 432 S 32.1 0.4 0:21.08 lt
> > 4545 roman 20 0 1796 344 256 R 32.1 0.3 0:21.07 lt
> > 4546 roman 20 0 1796 344 256 R 31.7 0.3 0:21.07 lt
> > 4547 roman 20 0 1532 272 216 R 3.3 0.2 0:01.94 l
> >
> > and i'm still wondering how that output was possible.
>
> I disabled the jiffies logic and the result is still the same, so this
> problem isn't related to resolution at all.
how did you disable the jiffies logic? Also, could you please send me
the cfs-debug-info.sh:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
captured _while_ the above workload is running. This is the third time
i've asked for that :-)
to establish that the basic sched_clock() behavior is sound on that box,
could you please also run this tool:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/tsc-dump.c
please run it both while the system is idle, and while there's a CPU hog
running:
while :; do :; done &
and send me that output too? (it's 2x 60 lines only) Thanks!
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists