linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/4] [RFC][PATCH] fs-writeback: redefining the dirty inode queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:34:12 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] [RFC][PATCH] fs-writeback: redefining the dirty inode queues

Andrew,

I'd like to propose a cleaner way of using the s_dirty, s_io, s_more_io
queues for the writeback of dirty inodes. The basic idea is to clearly
define the function of the queues, especially to decouple s_diry from
s_io/s_more_io.  The details are in the changelog of patch 2.

The patches are some cleanups on top of Andrew's s_dirty time-ordering
patches and Ken's s_more_io patch:

[PATCH 1/4] writeback: check time-ordering of s_io and s_more_io
[PATCH 2/4] writeback: 3-queue based writeback schedule
[PATCH 3/4] writeback: function renames and cleanups
[PATCH 4/4] writeback: fix ntfs with sb_has_dirty_inodes()

 fs/fs-writeback.c  |  196 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 fs/ntfs/super.c    |    4 
 include/linux/fs.h |    1 
 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

Note that the patches need rework for inserting into the right place of
your queue of -mm patches. I'll take care of it in the next take.

Thank you,
Fengguang
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/