[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc1166600708091734p22612a72g7fcc3e229203918f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:34:46 +1000
From: "Michael Ellerman" <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: ljhc@...ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arndb@...db.de>, cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: SLUB doesn't work with kdump kernel on Cell
On 8/9/07, Lucio Correia <ljhc@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 23:10 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 August 2007, Lucio Correia wrote:
> > > DMA 0 -> 12288
> > > Normal 12288 -> 12288
> > > early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges
> > > 0: 0 -> 2560
> > > 1: 12287 -> 12288
> >
> > As Christoph found, this memory map is really strange. Other machines
> > have something like
> >
> > Zone PFN ranges:
> > DMA 0 -> 16384
> > Normal 16384 -> 16384
> > early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges
> > 0: 0 -> 8192
> > 1: 8192 -> 16384
> >
> > Lucio,
> > What code builds the memory map that gets passed to the kdump kernel?
It comes out of the device tree, just like a regular kernel. The
device tree for the kdump kernel is built by kexec-tools, it parses
/proc/device-tree and does a bunch of logic to avoid various reserved
regions: the kernel, TCE tables, RTAS etc.
> I also tried to pass maxcpus=1 for the command line of second kernel,
> and it didn't work. How can I alternatively disable the node?
maxcpus is poorly tested and is known to be broken on Cell, please
don't use it, or fix it first :)
cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists