lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070812102754.a785e78a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:27:54 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: v2.6.23-rc2 locks up during boot (without acpi=off)

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:15:51 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:46 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:39:30 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I noticed that v2.6.23-rc1 locks up during boot, same thing happens now 
> > > > > with the latest linus' tree (+net-2.6.24 and tcp-2.6 tree stuff on top 
> > > > > of it; in -rc1 test they weren't though). The exact location of hang
> > > > > varies a bit though. No OOPS, does not respond to sysrq or anything else 
> > > > > besides reset. Last known bootable one is something like 2.6.22-rc4 
> > > > > (I usually run 2.6.21.5 on this machine, haven't tried any 2.6.22 on
> > > > > this after those rcs). Problem seems to start after this line:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Time: acpi_pm clocksource has been installed.
> > > > > 
> > > > > ...the power led starts blinking (not periodic cycle but more or less 
> > > > > varying on-off cycle, never seen that led blink before at all, didn't know 
> > > > > that one can make it blink :-)) and the machine gets consideably slower 
> > > > > too. Never have it been able to complete booting all they way up to login 
> > > > > prompt before lock up.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tried with acpi=off, boots just fine.
> > > >
> > > > It'd be great if you could run a git bisection search please.
> > > 
> > > [...snip...]
> > > 
> > > ...didn't bother to go any further as the other one just deals with printk 
> > > string... So this is the main suspect:
> > > 
> > > commit 18eab8550397f1f3d4b8b2c5257c88dae25d58ed
> > > Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> > > Date:   Fri Jun 15 19:37:00 2007 -0400
> > > 
> > >     ACPI: Enable C3 even when PM2_control is zero
> > >     
> > >     On systems that do not have pm2_control_block, we cannot really use
> > >     ARB_DISABLE before C3. We used to disable C3 totally on such systems.
> > >     
> > >     To be compatible with Windows, we need to enable C3 on such systems now.
> > >     We just skip ARB_DISABLE step before entering the C3-state and assume
> > >     hardware is handling things correctly. Also, ACPI spec is not clear
> > >     about pm2_control is _needed_ for C3 or not.
> > >     
> > >     We have atleast one system that need this to enable C3.
> > >     
> > >     Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> > >     Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > > 
> > 
> > OK, that's great, thanks.  So just to double-check, could you please
> > confirm that the below reversion fixes this post-2.6.22 regression?
> 
> Hmm, it was really worth of it, I did:
> $ git-fetch linus
> $ git-reset --hard linus
> [...make & install & boot...]
> 
> ...and voila, the problem went away, so something else seems to have
> fixed it between: ac07860264bd and 963c6527e0a0e. As you can notice,
> I didn't even have to revert it (I was just double checking current
> mainline first).
> 
> Is there a need to get a more detailed view about the cause or something, 
> or are details of this issue clear enough to everyone? I can do some more 
> research if necessary, though expect a bit longer latencies during the 
> next week...
> 
> In case none, thanks everyone, this issue seems solved. :-)
> 

We just had an acpi commit.  Something like ed3110efb538d7acbf635095c1382118f7414f75
might have fixed this.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ