[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BF66F4.9030106@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:00:52 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: Are we properly prepared to handle 3 Socket setups?
On 08/12/2007 10:35 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 05:17:10 +0200 Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com> wrote:
>> The line just below where it does that _does_ seem to have a problem:
>>
>> /*
>> * Maximum threshold is 125
>> */
>> threshold = min(125, threshold);
>>
>> as either the comment or the code is wrong and it seems it's the code. Added
>> Andrew Morton to the CC for that.
>
> Yes, that's inconsistent. And looking at Christoph's df9ecaba it's unclear
> whether the comment is wrong or the code is wrong. The code is wrong, I
> expect.
Extremely friendly of you to pretend I wasn't being thick at all but don't
worry, I can take it. Anyways, since Christoph wasn't in CC on that one:
On 08/12/2007 05:29 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> What's the problem? That line sets threshold to the smaller of the
> current value or 125, which is exactly what one would want to do if the
> maximum value is 125. Just do a couple of examples: eg if threshold is
> 100 going into that line, then the value is left alone; if threshold is
> 150 then it gets set to 125; and that seems exactly correct.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists