[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BF9549.3040808@novell.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:18:33 -0500
From: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...ell.com>
To: casey@...aufler-ca.com
CC: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
Casey Schaufler wrote:
> I respect the design decisions that SELinux has made regarding
> granularity without agreeing with them myself.
>
It isn't even an exclusive decision: both design points can be "right",
but aimed at different use cases. Which is why LSM exists, so users can
decide on an appropriate mechanism.
Crispin
--
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://crispincowan.com/~crispin/
Director of Software Engineering http://novell.com
AppArmor Chat: irc.oftc.net/#apparmor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists