| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20070813174505.15210.33547.sendpatchset@balbir-laptop>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:15:05 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Eric W Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux MM Mailing List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [-mm PATCH 7/9] Memory controller OOM handling (v5)
From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Out of memory handling for containers over their limit. A task from the
container over limit is chosen using the existing OOM logic and killed.
TODO:
1. As discussed in the OLS BOF session, consider implementing a user
space policy for OOM handling.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Signed-off-by: <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1 +
mm/memcontrol.c | 1 +
mm/oom_kill.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/memcontrol.h~mem-control-out-of-memory include/linux/memcontrol.h
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/include/linux/memcontrol.h~mem-control-out-of-memory 2007-08-13 23:06:12.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-balbir/include/linux/memcontrol.h 2007-08-13 23:06:12.000000000 +0530
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern unsigned long mem_container_isola
int mode, struct zone *z,
struct mem_container *mem_cont,
int active);
+extern void mem_container_out_of_memory(struct mem_container *mem);
static inline void mem_container_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
{
diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~mem-control-out-of-memory mm/memcontrol.c
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/mm/memcontrol.c~mem-control-out-of-memory 2007-08-13 23:06:12.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c 2007-08-13 23:06:12.000000000 +0530
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ int mem_container_charge(struct page *pa
}
css_put(&mem->css);
+ mem_container_out_of_memory(mem);
goto free_pc;
}
diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~mem-control-out-of-memory mm/oom_kill.c
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/mm/oom_kill.c~mem-control-out-of-memory 2007-08-13 23:06:12.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-balbir/mm/oom_kill.c 2007-08-13 23:06:12.000000000 +0530
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
int sysctl_panic_on_oom;
/* #define DEBUG */
@@ -47,7 +48,8 @@ int sysctl_panic_on_oom;
* of least surprise ... (be careful when you change it)
*/
-unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
+unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime,
+ struct mem_container *mem)
{
unsigned long points, cpu_time, run_time, s;
struct mm_struct *mm;
@@ -60,6 +62,13 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_CONTAINER_MEM_CONT
+ if (mem != NULL && mm->mem_container != mem) {
+ task_unlock(p);
+ return 0;
+ }
+#endif
+
/*
* The memory size of the process is the basis for the badness.
*/
@@ -204,7 +213,8 @@ static inline int constrained_alloc(stru
*
* (not docbooked, we don't want this one cluttering up the manual)
*/
-static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints)
+static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
+ struct mem_container *mem)
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
struct task_struct *chosen = NULL;
@@ -258,7 +268,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
if (p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
continue;
- points = badness(p, uptime.tv_sec);
+ points = badness(p, uptime.tv_sec, mem);
if (points > *ppoints || !chosen) {
chosen = p;
*ppoints = points;
@@ -370,6 +380,30 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_
return oom_kill_task(p);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_CONTAINER_MEM_CONT
+void mem_container_out_of_memory(struct mem_container *mem)
+{
+ unsigned long points = 0;
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ container_lock();
+ rcu_read_lock();
+retry:
+ p = select_bad_process(&points, mem);
+ if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (!p)
+ p = current;
+
+ if (oom_kill_process(p, points, "Memory container out of memory"))
+ goto retry;
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ container_unlock();
+}
+#endif
+
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(oom_notify_list);
int register_oom_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
@@ -442,7 +476,7 @@ retry:
* Rambo mode: Shoot down a process and hope it solves whatever
* issues we may have.
*/
- p = select_bad_process(&points);
+ p = select_bad_process(&points, NULL);
if (PTR_ERR(p) == -1UL)
goto out;
_
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists