linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [374/2many] MAINTAINERS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:50:03 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [374/2many] MAINTAINERS - PCNET32 NETWORK DRIVER


On Aug 13 2007 14:08, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
>> Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
>> So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources, 
>> and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split them 
>> up at all.  The fact that the split up landed you at 300+ patches is a 
>> very good indication of that.
>
>Actually, I can see 546 patches up to now. Horrid.
>
>Besides that, it's very unfortunate that every single mail of this 
>ridiculously huuuuge patch series starts a new thread (no 'References' or 
>'In-Reply-To' header), so it's not possible to nuke it at once in an usual 
>way.

Pine:
	; t s MAINTAINERS <enter> a d x

and it's all gone ;-) though.. it does not cover for replies trickling in
later. Granted, ^D to delete the whole thread (if there was one)
would have been easier.



	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/