[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0708140009110.32395@er-systems.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:12:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2 swsusp, suddenly increased uptime
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 13 August 2007 23:31, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, 12 August 2007 21:39, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > today I saw this (output from my suspend script):
> > > >
> > > > -> woke up at Sun Aug 12 11:39:17 CEST 2007
> > > > -> uptime is
> > > > 11:39am up 8 days 0:41, 10 users, load average: 26.12, 6.35, 2.17
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Then I did a software suspend. After waking up, I saw this:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -> woke up at Sun Aug 12 14:41:56 CEST 2007
> > > > -> uptime is
> > > > 2:41pm up 44 days 9:11, 12 users, load average: 35.17, 9.17, 3.33
> >
> > I just want to add, I built 2.6.23-rc2 on Aug 4th and this happened on Aug
> > 12 and I suspend once a day. And the only thing which was odd was the
> > uptime, nothing else.
> >
> > I rebooted with 2.6.23-rc3 today, so the odd uptime is gone.
> > Should I try 8 suspend cycles or something to reproduce it again?
>
> Well, if you can, please try to do something like this.
I tried 20 suspend cycles, but this time with
echo reboot > /sys/power/disk
Nothing special happend.
I could try with "echo shutdown" if this makes sense, tomorrow.
Just let me know.
Thomas
--
Thomas Vögtle email: thomas@...gtle-clan.de
----- http://www.voegtle-clan.de/thomas ------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists