linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD Fam10h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708122021300.30176@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, dean@...tic.org, patches@...-64.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD
 Fam10h



On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> This does make me wonder, why these weren't caught in -mm ?

I'm worried that -mm isn't getting a lot of exposure these days. People do 
run it, but I wonder how many..

That said, a lot of machines won't ever use MMCFG (especially the old ones 
- and most of the new ones would run x86-64), so that probably explains at 
least that one.

But the x86-64 alternates code would hit anybody who had the "use rep movs 
for best performance" code, and I'm surprised that one wasn't caught 
earlier. X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD is not uncommon (Core 2 has it). So I assume 
that one wasn't really in -mm at all.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/