[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070813002342.GA6908@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:23:42 +0800
From: WU Fengguang <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ch.ncsc.mil>,
Chris Vance <cvance@....com>, Wayne Salamon <wsalamon@....com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...hat.com>, dgoeddel@...stedcs.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] NULL pointer dereference in __vm_enough_memory()
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:21:43PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
> | Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
> | shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
> | do right now 8)
> |
> |
[...]
> | -int __vm_enough_memory(long pages, int cap_sys_admin)
> | +int __vm_enough_memory(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages, int cap_sys_admin)
> | {
> | unsigned long free, allowed;
> |
> | @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
> |
> | /* Don't let a single process grow too big:
> | leave 3% of the size of this process for other processes */
> | - allowed -= current->mm->total_vm / 32;
> | + allowed -= mm->total_vm / 32;
>
> So mm->total_vm is 0 for __bprm_mm_init case. Is that ok? Or I miss
> something?
Yeah, Alan adds mm to the interfaces and leaves us the question of
"what mm to pass in when current->mm == NULL?" ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists