linux-kernel - How to make -mm a more viable testbed (was: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200708130808.46989.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:08:46 +0300
From:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: How to make -mm a more viable testbed (was: [PATCH] [1/12] x86: Work around mmio config space quirk on AMD)

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
> > 
> > This does make me wonder, why these weren't caught in -mm ?
> 
> I'm worried that -mm isn't getting a lot of exposure these days. People do 
> run it, but I wonder how many..

Well, I'm not running it because it's got too much garbage in it, which makes 
it a pretty unrealistic testbed.  And to make matters worse, I also stay 
away from rc's as a consequence.

To make -mm more viable, it may be advisable to restructure -mm in such a way 
as to be a Kconfig option to mainline.  This would probably involve some 
patch management functionality to apply experimental submissions on a 
per-patch basis, as opposed to being a 'take it or leave it slam onto 
mainline' patch.

Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/