| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1186987609.10249.22.camel@localhost> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:46:49 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, pcnet32@...izon.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [374/2many] MAINTAINERS - PCNET32 NETWORK DRIVER On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:36 -0700, David Miller wrote: > Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious. > > So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources, > and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split > them up at all. The fact that the split up landed you at 300+ patches > is a very good indication of that. More than ridiculous. Completely agree. I tried to send 1 patch over the last couple of days. Unfortunately, it's > 100KB and disappears into the void. How about 10 patches or so? What about maintainer sign offs? Personally, I don't think it's necessary, but for the subsystem maintainers like you, if or when the get_maintainers.pl get integrated into patch generation mechanisms, you might get more emails. Perhaps more than you want. Suggestions? One good thing by emailing all the listed maintainers, I've gotten several bounces for invalid addresses. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists