linux-kernel - why use memcpy when memmove is there?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <977159.24669.qm@web7606.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:55:40 +0100 (BST)
From:	sk malik <srikrishanmalik@...oo.co.in>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: why use memcpy when memmove is there?

Hi, All

We were looking at  "[kernel]/lib/string.c"
(http://lxr.linux.no/source/lib/string.c#L500)

memcpy copies a part of memory to some other location
but It will not work for all cases of overlapping
blocks.(if the start of destination block falls
between the source block)

while memove copes with overlapping areas.

then why is memcpy present in the sources can't we
simply do

"#define memcpy memmove" in include/linux/string.h

or am I missing something?

Regards
Sri



      Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/