[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070813111411.GF24018@shell.boston.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:14:11 -0400
From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on cris
From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Use volatile consistently in atomic.h on cris.
Signed-off-by: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
--- linux-2.6.23-rc3-orig/include/asm-cris/atomic.h 2007-07-08 19:32:17.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc3/include/asm-cris/atomic.h 2007-08-13 05:23:37.000000000 -0400
@@ -11,12 +11,19 @@
* resource counting etc..
*/
-typedef struct { volatile int counter; } atomic_t;
+typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
-#define atomic_read(v) ((v)->counter)
-#define atomic_set(v,i) (((v)->counter) = (i))
+static inline int atomic_read(atomic_t *v)
+{
+ return *(volatile int *)&v->counter;
+}
+
+static inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
+{
+ *(volatile int *)&v->counter = i;
+}
/* These should be written in asm but we do it in C for now. */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists