[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1187002400.22086.6.camel@dragonlady>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:53:20 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@...ba.org>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, sfrench@...ba.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [123/2many] MAINTAINERS - COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM
(CIFS)
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:25 -0700, joe@...ches.com wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ L: samba-technical@...ts.samba.org
> W: http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
> T: git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git
> S: Supported
> +F: fs/cifs/
No comment on the F:, but the L: entry here is interesting. Is
samba-technical really the right list for cifs-vfs patches? Aside from
being CC'ed on such patches, I've never seen discussion of them on the
Samba mailing lists.
Steve: Shouldn't that be linux-cifs-client?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists