linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [374/2many] MAINTAINERS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708131402490.3948@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:08:08 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	joe@...ches.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	pcnet32@...izon.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [374/2many] MAINTAINERS - PCNET32 NETWORK DRIVER

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:

> Ok, 374 patches is just rediculious.
> So many patches eats up an enormous amount of mailing list resources, 
> and for these patches in particular there are few reasons to split them 
> up at all.  The fact that the split up landed you at 300+ patches is a 
> very good indication of that.

Actually, I can see 546 patches up to now. Horrid.

Besides that, it's very unfortunate that every single mail of this 
ridiculously huuuuge patch series starts a new thread (no 'References' or 
'In-Reply-To' header), so it's not possible to nuke it at once in an usual 
way.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/