[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070813094520.26a3e6bc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:45:20 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...-64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: optionally show last exception from/to register
contents
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:21:10 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I though you did, but since I never saw it appear in any release, I posted
> > this one...
>
> It's a little different (and somewhat hackish I admit)
> ftp://firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/debug/last-branch
> It has far more overhead than yours of course.
>
> The only way to merge something like that would be dynamic
> patching and I was never quite motivated for that.
>
> > So especially with the first concern of yours - is it worth at all rev-ing this
> > patch to address the other change requests you voiced?
>
> The patch is useful even with the race, just document somewhere
> that it is unreliable (perhaps in the printk itself) and do the
> other changes.
and add "ler" entry to Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, please,
with what it means.
> I would also suggest to enable it by default.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists