[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aday7gf8hw4.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:27:07 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
surya.prabhakar@...ro.com, mingo@...hat.com,
yaku@...1.kbnes.nec.co.jp, kisimoto@...1.kbnes.nec.co.jp,
zab@...hat.com, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [KJ] replacing kmalloc with kzalloc in io_apic.c
> from my days submitting numerous patches of this type, i can recall
> that in cases like the above, it's a judgment call -- use kzalloc to
> get the zeroing, or use kcalloc to get the array-flavoured behaviour.
> what a shame you can't have both at the same time.
kcalloc() zeros memory just like standard calloc() in userspace.
As <linux/slab.h> says:
* kcalloc - allocate memory for an array. The memory is set to zero.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists