linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH again] [libata] libata driver for bf548 on chip ATAPI controller.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070814103013.6899813f@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:30:13 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"Sonic Zhang" <sonic.adi@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH again] [libata] libata driver for bf548 on chip ATAPI
 controller.

> +/**
> + * Register transfer timing table
> + */

Libata has a complete set of transfer mode tables and timing functions -
any reason for not using them ?


> +                       /* increase tcyc - tdvs (tcyc_tdvs) until we
> meed
> +                        * the minimum cycle length
> +                        */
> +                       while ( (tdvs + tcyc_tdvs) < tcyc ) {
> +                               tcyc_tdvs++;
> +                       }

Why not 

			if ((tdvs + tcyc_tvds) < tcyc)
				tcyc_tdvs = tcyc - tdvs;

> +                       /* increase tk until we meed the minimum cycle
> length */
> +                       while ( (tkw+td) < n0 ) {
> +                               tkw++;
> +                       }


			if (tkw + td < n0)
				tkw = n0 - td;

(and fix up brackets)

>
> +static void inline wait_complete(unsigned long base, unsigned short
> mask)
> +{
> +       unsigned short status;
> +
> +       do {
> +               status = ATAPI_GET_INT_STATUS(base) & mask;
> +       } while (!status);

Does this need a timeout or can a device write never get stuck ?

> +static int bfin_port_start(struct ata_port *ap)
> +{
> +       pr_debug("in atapi port start\n");
> +       if (ap->udma_mask != 0 || ap->mwdma_mask != 0) {
> +               if (request_dma(CH_ATAPI_RX, "BFIN ATAPI RX DMA") >= 0)
> {
> +                       if (request_dma(CH_ATAPI_TX,
> +                               "BFIN ATAPI TX DMA") >= 0) {
> +                               return 0;
> +                       }
> +                       free_dma(CH_ATAPI_RX);
> +               }
> +               ap->udma_mask = 0;
> +               ap->mwdma_mask = 0;
> +               dev_err(ap->dev, "Unable to request ATAPI DMA!\n");
> +               return -EBUSY;

Is this an error case - if you clear the UDMA/MWDMA mask then DMA won't
be needed will it so you can continue after the problem but slowly ?


Otherwise looks sound. A lot of reset method duplication but that isn't
your fault and something that wants more work in libata to avoid

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/