linux-kernel - Re: O_NONBLOCK is broken

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:33:19 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: O_NONBLOCK is broken

> b) Make recv(fd, buf, size, flags) and send(fd, buf, size, flags);
>    work with non-socket fds too, for flags==0 or flags==MSG_DONTWAIT.
>    (it's ok to fail with "socket op on non-socket fd" for other values
>    of flags)

I think that makes a lot of sense, and to be honest other MSG_ flags make
useful sense and have meaningful semantics that might be helpful
elsewhere if ever coded that way.

If you want to do this the first job is going to be to sort out the way
non-block is propogated to device driver read/write handlers. At the
moment they all check filp->f_flags

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/