linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [443/2many] MAINTAINERS - HIBERNATION (aka Software Suspend, aka swsusp):

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708141112110.30176@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [443/2many] MAINTAINERS - HIBERNATION (aka Software
 Suspend, aka swsusp):

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> SUSPEND TO RAM:
> P:	Pavel Machek
> M:	pavel@...e.cz
> P:	Rafael J. Wysocki
> M:	rjw@...k.pl
> L:	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> S:	Maintained
> F:	Documentation/power/
> F:	arch/i386/kernel/acpi/
> F:	arch/x86_64/kernel/acpi/
> F:	arch/x86_64/kernel/suspend.c
> F:	drivers/base/power/
> F:	kernel/power/
> F:	include/linux/suspend.h
> F:	include/linux/freezer.h
> F:	include/linux/pm.h
> F:	include/asm-*/suspend.h

Quite frankly, I think the MAINTAINERS file gets a whole lot uglier this 
way.

There's also a rather fundamental issue: this will likely make people 
touch the MAINTAINERS file *more*, and from a maintenance standpoint, that 
is exactly the wrong thing to have (one central file that everybody 
touches). It just tends to generate unnecessary merge conflicts etc. 

(We used to have that issue with the central configuration file, for 
example).

So the more I look at these things, the more convinced I am that this is 
not the right thing to do. These things should *not* be in one huge file, 
and I'd much much rather have the maintainership information be carried 
along with the subsystem itself, or the files it contains.

In other words, it would be much better to just have per-file markers, 
along with some per-subdirectory stuff or similar.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/