[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000501c7dea3$48bf98a0$6501a8c0@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:45:25 -0700
From: "Mitchell Erblich" <erblichs@...thlink.net>
To: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@....com.au>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"\"Dmitry Adamushko\"" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: minor Suggested cleanup: RT / sched : Have RT tasks use PF_LESS_THROTTLE flag
Group, Ingo Molnar, and Dmitry, et al,
task mm/page-writeback.c : get_dirty_limits()
Shouldn't the PF_LESS_THROTTLE flag be
scheduling class independent?
The below is a suggestion is to use the flag for
RT tasks.
-- to drop the rt_task() call within the function
if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
1) becomes
if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE)
Then
2) in kernel/sched.c set:
p->flags |= PF_LESS_THROTTLE before the break;
case SCHED_FIFO:
case SCHED_RR:
p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
p->flags |= PF_LESS_THROTTLE;
break;
3) Unset it in case sched class changed; before the break
case SCHED_NORMAL:
case SCHED_BATCH:
case SCHED_IDLE:
p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
p->flags &= ~PF_LESS_THROTTLE;
break;
4) set the flag rt_mutex_setprio with braces
if (rt_prio(prio)) {
p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
p->flags |= PF_LESS_THROTTLE;
} else
5) Am I missing anything?
Mitchell Erblich
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists