| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070814204951.GA2065@vino.hallyn.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:49:51 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, clameter@....com,
bob.picco@...com, nacc@...ibm.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
mel@...net.ie, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ckrm-tech <ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.23-rc2-mm2, mounting cpusets causes a hang
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serge@...lyn.com):
> Quoting Lee Schermerhorn (Lee.Schermerhorn@...com):
> > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 13:03 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Lee Schermerhorn (Lee.Schermerhorn@...com):
> > > > On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 15:12 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > > Quoting Dhaval Giani (dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On mounting cpusets using containers, I have been hitting the following
> > > > > > bug.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > > kernel BUG at kernel/cpuset.c:331!
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > > CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
> > > > > > CONFIG_X86_PAE=y
> > > > > > # CONFIG_NUMA is not set
> > > > > > CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP=y
> > > > > > CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y
> > > > > > CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL=y
> > > > > > # CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set
> > > > > > # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set
> > > > > > CONFIG_FLATMEM=y
> > > > > > CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y
> > > > > > # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_STATIC is not set
> > > > > > CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS=4
> > > > > > CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT=y
> > > > > > CONFIG_ZONE_DMA_FLAG=1
> > > > <snip>
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, I'm seeing the same thing. Oddly, my node_states[N_NORMAL_MEMORY]
> > > > > and node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] are empty, while node_states[N_ONLINE]
> > > > > contains my single cpu (on i386 kvm image).
> > > > >
> > > > > -serge
> > > >
> > > > Yes, you'll definitely hit that BUG if the N_HIGH_MEMORY mask is empty.
> > > > So far, I can't see how this could be, tho'. __build_all_zonelists()
> > > > should be called for non-NUMA as well as NUMA. It iterates over "all
> > >
> > > Yup, and it is, and some debug statements insist that
> > > node_set_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) is being called for cpu 0,
> > > and the state is in fact being correctly set.
> > >
> > > So it must get cleared later...
> >
> > OK. That helps. I'll see what I can find...
>
> Well apparently I lied? I don't think it's getting cleared in node_states.
> I'm doing:
>
> static void guarantee_online_mems(const struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *pmask)
> {
> int nid=0;
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: at top, node %d is %d\n",
> __FUNCTION__, nid, node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY));
> while (cs && !nodes_intersects(cs->mems_allowed,
> node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY])) {
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: in loop\n", __FUNCTION__);
> cs = cs->parent;
> }
> if (cs) {
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: cs was true\n", __FUNCTION__);
> nodes_and(*pmask, cs->mems_allowed,
> node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
> }
> else
> {
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: cs was false\n", __FUNCTION__);
> *pmask = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
> }
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: at bottom, node %d is %d\n",
> __FUNCTION__, nid, node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY));
> printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: at bottom, in pmask node %d is %d\n",
> __FUNCTION__, nid, node_isset(nid, *pmask));
> BUG_ON(!nodes_intersects(*pmask, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]));
> }
>
> and getting:
>
> guarantee_online_mems: in loop
> guarantee_online_mems: cs was false
> guarantee_online_mems: at bottom, node 0 is 1
> guarantee_online_mems: at bottom, in pmask node 0 is 0
>
>
> So I'm guess that
> *pmask = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
> isn't doing what it was intended to do? That or I've got node_state()
> wrong...
Argh.
CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT was unset, so MAX_NUMNODES=1, so
node_state() and node_set_state() are dummies.
So __build_all_zonelists is using the dummy node_state() and
not actually setting node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY], and my debug
statements were using the dumy node_state() which returns 1
if n==0 :)
Here is a patch which fixes the bug on my system. As noted in
the patch description, there are other calls to node_set_state() in
mm/page_alloc.c which might also need to be switched to node_set(),
if this is deemed the right solution.
thanks,
-serge
>From 8cffdf9bc60af3894858bcc9412aa80938064435 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sergeh@...ibm.com <hallyn@...nel.(none)>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:47:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] memoryless: actually set node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]
If CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT is unset, then MAX_NUMNODES=1, and
node_set_state() does nothing. This means that __build_all_zonelists()
does not actually set node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]. cpusets needs
node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] to be correctly set, or it will raise a
bug when a new cpuset is created.
Switch to using node_set() in __build_all_zonelists() to
make sure it is actually set.
Note there are other calls to node_set_state() in mm/page_alloc.c,
which perhaps should also be modified. Since this area is completely
foreign to me I thought I'd first make sure this is the right approach.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 1a40099..111e311 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2443,7 +2443,7 @@ static int __build_all_zonelists(void *dummy)
/* Any memory on that node */
if (pgdat->node_present_pages)
- node_set_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY);
+ node_set(nid, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]);
check_for_regular_memory(pgdat);
}
return 0;
--
1.5.1
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists