[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070814214430.GD23308@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:44:30 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/9] Atomic reclaim: Save irq flags in vmscan.c
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 02:37:27PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > > We already have such a flag in the zone structure
> >
> > Zone structure is not strictly CPU local so it's broader
> > than needed. But it might work.
>
> We could convert this into a per cpu array?
Perhaps. That would make it more expensive to read for
its current users though.
> But that still creates lots of overhead each time we take the lru lock!
A lot of overhead in what way? Setting a flag in a cache hot
per CPU data variable shouldn't be more than a few cycles.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists