lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46C233CB.9000602@am.sony.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:59:23 -0700
From:	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To:	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: kfree(0) - ok?

Hi all,

I have a quick question.

I'm trying to resurrect a patch from the Linux-tiny patch suite,
to do accounting of kmalloc memory allocations.  In testing it
with Linux 2.6.22, I've found a large number of kfrees of
NULL pointers.

Is this considered OK?  Or should I examine the offenders
to see if something is coded badly?

Thanks,
 -- Tim

=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ