lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070815002034.GW3406@bingen.suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 02:20:35 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Sebastian Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] i386: use asm() like the other atomic operations already do.

> My config with march=pentium-m and gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2):
>   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 3434150  249176  176128 3859454  3ae3fe atomic_normal/vmlinux
> 3435308  249176  176128 3860612  3ae884 atomic_inlineasm/vmlinux

What is the difference between atomic_normal and atomic_inlineasm? 

>  /**
>   * atomic_read - read atomic variable
>   * @v: pointer of type atomic_t
> - * 
> + *

Please don't change white space in patches

>   * Atomically reads the value of @v.
> - */ 
> -#define atomic_read(v)		((v)->counter)
> + */
> +static __inline__ int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
> +{
> +	int t;
> +
> +	__asm__ __volatile__(

And don't use __*__ in new code

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ