[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46C33835.90703@partiallystapled.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:30:29 -0400
From: Michael Tharp <gxti@...tiallystapled.com>
To: Marc Perkel <mperkel@...oo.com>
CC: alan <alan@...eserver.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
Marc Perkel wrote:
> That not a problem - it's a feature. In such a
> situation the person would get a general file creation
> error.
Feature or not, it's still vulnerable to probing by malicious users. If
there are create permissions on the directory, the invisibility is not
perfect.
> Although it isn't likely people would structure
> files with invisible files in directories that the
> user has create permissions [...]
... /tmp ...
> [...] it is logical that if I
> put a file in a place where the user has no rights I
> want it to stay there. Currently the user can delete
> files where they have no rights.
Indeed. The sticky bit works around this, but IMHO it's a hack.
> I might also want to restrict the kind of a user can
> createor give permission to create only certian file
> names.
>
> /etc/vz/conf/*.conf - create - readonly - self-rw
> /etc/vz/conf - deny
>
> This would allow the user to read all *.conf files,
> create new *.conf files, and full permissions to
> read/write/delete files that the user created but not
> files that others created. If listing a directory then
> only the *.conf files would appear even if other files
> are in the directory.
It'd be interesting to find a use case for this, but that's no reason
not to provide the functionality.
> Marc Perkel
> Junk Email Filter dot com
> http://www.junkemailfilter.com
-- m. tharp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists