[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46C33A67.1020102@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:39:51 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>,
Bret Towe <magnade@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] PIE executable randomization
On 08/14/2007 04:41 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> (added Arjan to CC, as he has been working on the kernel part of the
> randomization previously)
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> If I'm reading the above hunk correctly, this means we will randomize
>> all PIEs and even all dynamic linkers invoked as executables on i?86 and
>> x86_64, and on the rest of arches we won't randomize at all, instead
>> load ET_DYN objects at ELF_ET_DYN_BASE address. But I don't see anything
>> i?86/x86_64 specific on this.
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> actually, it is currently arch-specific, and that's because of different
> memory layouts on different archs.
>
> It turned out recently that PIE-compiled binaries on x86_64, that perform
> larger amount of brk-allocations (for example bash) will not work (but
> they will work on ?86). This is because currently on ?86 the memory layout
> is as follows:
But your patch is enabling randomization for x86_64, because CONFIG_X86
includes both 32 and 64 bit archs.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists