linux-kernel - Re: QUESTION: RT & SCHED & fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1187156037.6615.17.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:33:57 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@...thlink.net>
Cc:	"\"Linux Kernel Mailing List\"" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"\"Ingo Molnar\"" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"\"\\\"Dmitry Adamushko\\\"\"" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: QUESTION: RT & SCHED & fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fair
	for RT tasks.

On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> Group, Ingo Molnar, etc,
> 
> Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair?
> missing is the RT for .task_new.

No class specific initialization needs to be done for RT tasks.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/