linux-kernel - [PATCH] Use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1187217977.6062.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:46:17 -0700
From:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Use num_possible_cpus() instead of NR_CPUS for timer
	distribution

Andrew requested this fixup awhile back, and I just now got to it
(apologies for being slow).

To avoid lock contention, we distribute the sched_timer calls across the
cpus so they do not trigger at the same instant. However, I used
NR_CPUS, which can cause needless grouping on small smp systems
depending on your kernel config. This patch converts to using
num_possible_cpus() so we spread it as evenly as possible on every
machine.

Briefly tested w/ NR_CPUS=255 and verified reduced contention.

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>

Index: 2.6-rt/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6-rt.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ 2.6-rt/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ void tick_setup_sched_timer(void)
 	/* Get the next period (per cpu) */
 	ts->sched_timer.expires = tick_init_jiffy_update();
 	offset = ktime_to_ns(tick_period) >> 1;
-	do_div(offset, NR_CPUS);
+	do_div(offset, num_possible_cpus());
 	offset *= smp_processor_id();
 	ts->sched_timer.expires = ktime_add_ns(ts->sched_timer.expires, offset);
 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/