[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070815234434.GC28775@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:44:34 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, sebastian@...akpoint.cc,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] i386: use asm() like the other atomic operations already do.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 01:02:23PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> >Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> >>>My config with march=pentium-m and gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2):
> >>> text data bss dec hex filename
> >>>3434150 249176 176128 3859454 3ae3fe atomic_normal/vmlinux
> >>>3435308 249176 176128 3860612 3ae884 atomic_inlineasm/vmlinux
> >>What is the difference between atomic_normal and atomic_inlineasm?
> >
> >The inline asm stops certain optimisations from occuring.
> >
> >I'm still unconvinced why we need this because nobody has
> >brought up any examples of kernel code that legitimately
> >need this.
>
> There's plenty of kernel code that *wants* this though. If we can
You keep saying this yet everytime I ask for an example I
get nothing.
> reduce the need for register-clobbering barriers, shrink our binaries,
> shrink our code, improve performance, and avoid heisenbugs, I think it's
> a win, whether or not we *need* it.
Hmm, you're increasing our binary size and probably killing
performance.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists