[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070815085217.GA14156@aurum.uhlenkott.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:52:17 -0700
From: Jason Uhlenkott <jason@...enkott.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kfree(0) - ok?
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:28:54 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Aug 14 2007 16:21, Jason Uhlenkott wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 15:55:48 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >> NULL is not 0 though.
> >
> >It is. Its representation isn't guaranteed to be all-bits-zero,
>
> C guarantees that.
Equality with the expression 0 is guaranteed. Representation isn't.
http://www.c-faq.com/null/varieties.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists