linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] Introductory patches for bio refactor.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:37:27 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] Introductory patches for bio refactor.

On Thu, Aug 16 2007, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> Hi Jens,
>  I wonder if you would accept these patches the block layer.
>  They are, as far as I can tell, quite uncontroversial and provide
>  good cleanups.
> 
>  The first is a minor bug-fix.
>  The next to replace helper function that take a bio (always the first
>  bio of a request), to instead take a request.
> 
>  The last two combine to replace rq_for_each_bio with
>  rq_for_each_segment which makes blk_recalc_rq_segments a lot
>  cleaner, and improves (to a lesser degree) every other place that
>  used rq_for_each_bio.
> 
>  The net result is a decrease in object code size (for my x86-64 compile)
>  for block/built-in.o of 96 bytes, though there is some growth out in
>  drivers making and over-all decrease of only 48 bytes.

Thanks for seperating these out Neil, will go over them this morning!

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/