[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6891.1187273061@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:04:21 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Susanne Oberhauser <froh@...ell.com>
Cc: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Linux-Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
opensuse-kernel@...nsuse.org, opensuse@...nsuse.org
Subject: Re: Testing the Current Upstream Kernel
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:28:34 +0200, Susanne Oberhauser said:
> Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de> writes:
>
> > With our openSUSE Build Service we build a daily kernel, where we take
> > nightly snapshots of the current upstream development kernel (Linus' kernel
> > tree linux-2.6.git) without any patches (besides those we need for building a
> > RPM). We do call this the vanilla kernel. It can be downloaded from:
> >
> > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/Vanilla/SUSE_Factory/
>
> Would it make sense to build it for the other distros as well? like
> debian, fedora and mandrake? I mena in _theory_ we could build it for
> those distros in the build server, couldn't we?
Most of the distros prefer a chance to add their own "Special Sauce" to it
before building, and building inside their build environment (for instance,
Fedora RPM's get PGP-signed - *that* would be a trust issue right there).
The current Fedora Rawhide kernel is 'kernel-2.6.23-0.105.rc3.fc8', and a few
RPMs ago it was based against -rc2-git5, so they track *very* close. I think
that crew is managing well enough without help from the kernel.org build
server.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists