[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17471.1187278162@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:29:22 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Michael Tharp <gxti@...tiallystapled.com>,
alan <alan@...eserver.org>, Marc Perkel <mperkel@...oo.com>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Thinking outside the box on file systems
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:09:16 EDT, Phillip Susi said:
> No recursion is needed because only one acl exists, so that is the only
> one you need to update. At least on disk. Any cached acls in memory of
> descendant objects would need updated, but the number of those should be
> relatively small.
On my laptop (this is a *laptop*, mind you):
% df -i /home
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-home
655360 532361 122999 82% /home
What happens if I do a 'mv /home /home1'? Looks like more than a "relatively
small" number. A cold-cache 'find' takes a few minutes to wade through it all,
so any solutions you come up with should beware of locking issues...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists