[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1187281856.2663.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:30:56 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, stable@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Alberto Pires de Oliveira Neto <apon1@...ra.com.br>,
giedrius@...lt
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - Add a .note.SuSE section
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:24 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [ This is both 2.6.24 and -stable material ]
>
> SuSE seems to require that binaries have a .note.SuSE section.
> Without it, UML segfaults if any parameters are passed on the command
> line.
this sounds like something really stupid and bad... why would the kernel
need to have a per-distro note section???
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists