[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070816011426.GD9645@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:14:26 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
ak@...e.de, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
wjiang@...ilience.com, cfriesen@...tel.com, zlynx@....org,
rpjday@...dspring.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
segher@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:53:16AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:49:50PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:30:23AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks. But I don't need a summary of the thread, I'm asking
> > > for an extant code snippet in our kernel that benefits from
> > > the volatile change and is not part of a busy-wait.
> >
> > Sorry, can't help you there. I really do believe that the information
> > you need (as opposed to the specific item you are asking for) really
> > has been put forth in this thread.
>
> That only leads me to believe that such a code snippet simply
> does not exist.
Whatever...
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists