lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708161424010.18861@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de,
	dgc@....com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
	trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com,
	richard@....demon.co.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, pj@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v9

Is there any way to make the global limits on which the dirty rate 
calculations are based cpuset specific?

A process is part of a cpuset and that cpuset has only a fraction of 
memory of the whole system. 

And only a fraction of that fraction can be dirtied. We do not currently 
enforce such limits which can cause the amount of dirty pages in 
cpusets to become excessively high. I have posted several patchsets that 
deal with that issue. See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/5

It seems that limiting dirty pages in cpusets may be much easier to 
realize in the context of this patchset. The tracking of the dirty pages 
per node is not necessary if one would calculate the maximum amount of 
dirtyable pages in a cpuset and use that as a base, right?




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ