[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46C58B4E.4080803@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:49:34 +0200
From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wu, Bryan" <Bryan.Wu@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOMMU: Separate out VMAs
David Howells wrote:
> David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes. I found the major leak this morning. There may be a minor leak, but I'm
>> not convinced it's in the mmap stuff. See revised patch.
>
> Oops. That was the old patch. Try this one instead.
>
Here are some changes to make it more stable on my system. In
do_mmap_private, I've commented out the logic to free excess pages, as
it fragments terribly and causes a simple
while true; do cat /proc/buddyinfo; done
loop to go oom. Also, I think you're freeing high-order pages unaligned
to their order?
In shrink_vma, we must save the mm across calls to remove_vma_from_mm
(oops when telnetting into the box).
In do_munmap, we can deal with freeing more than one vma. I've not
touched the rb-tree logic in the shared file case, as I have no idea
what it's trying to do given that only exact matches are allowed.
It still does not survive my mmap stress-tester, so I'll keep looking.
Why do we need vm_regions for anonymous memory? Wouldn't it be enough
to just have a VMA?
Bernd
--
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif
View attachment "fish.diff" of type "text/plain" (3893 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists