[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46C59BBD.6050204@qumranet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:59:41 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>
CC: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4, second shot]Introduce "account_guest_time"
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> This is another way to compute guest time... I remove the "account modifiers"
> mechanism and call directly account_guest_time() from account_system_time().
> account_system_time() computes user, system and guest times according value
> accumulated in vtime (a ktime_t) in task_struct by the virtual machine.
>
> @@ -3246,6 +3277,10 @@
> struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> cputime64_t tmp;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GUEST_ACCOUNTING
> + cputime = account_guest_time(p, cputime);
> +#endif
> +
> p->stime = cputime_add(p->stime, cputime);
>
> /* Add system time to cpustat. */
In order to reduce the impact on whatever function this is in (use diff
-p please), you can always have a definition of account_guest_time:
#else
static cputime_t account_guest_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime)
{
return cputime;
}
#endif
This way the #ifdef/#endif is not necessary when calling it.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists