| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:58:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com> cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>, Salikh Zakirov <salikh@...il.com>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>, LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <git@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: Storing Maintainers info around the kernel tree On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Rene Herman wrote: > On 08/16/2007 11:39 PM, Stefan Richter wrote: > > Rene Herman wrote: > > >> I personally don't think there's a whole lot wrong with more and more > >> expecting people who submit patches (for whom this automation is > >> intended) to be using git. > > > > You mean "people who frequently submit patches for various different > > subsystems". > > Erm, I guess. Is that agreeing or disagreeing with me? Don't forget also that the MAINTAINERS information is (or should be!) used by people who want to submit bug reports, not just by people who submit patches. Bug reporters shouldn't need to use Git. Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists