[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070817200022.GH8464@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:00:22 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: bunk@...nel.org, josh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make rcutorture RNG use temporal entropy
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
> >
> > The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
> > preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
> > rcutorture's RNG to gather entropy from the new cpu_clock() interface
> > (relying on interrupts, preemption, daemons, and rcutorture's reader
> > thread's rock-bottom scheduling priority to provide useful entropy),
> > and also adds and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() to make that interface available
> > to GPLed kernel modules such as rcutorture.
> >
> > Passes several hours of rcutorture.
>
> Please explain what "conflict with" means so that I can work out if
> this is a needed-in-2.6.23 change, thanks.
Not needed in 2.6.23. This change falls into the "preparation for -rt"
category. Also in the "don't unnecessarily eat entropy, leave some for
the people needing crypographically secure randomness" category.
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists