[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708171342190.9404@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kfree(0) - ok?
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> are we seeing a pattern here? We could stick the unlikely inside
> ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR() itself. That's a little bit sleazy though - there might
> be future callsites at which it is likely, who knows?
Thought about that myself but then there would be a weird side effect to
ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(). But since your thinking along the same lines: Lets do
it. I will fix up the patch to do just that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists