linux-kernel - Re: kfree(0)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020708171442x52b18722k2971ceef96d3e72@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:42:32 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Cc:	"Satyam Sharma" <satyam@...radead.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>,
	"Tim Bird" <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	"linux kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kfree(0) - ok?

On 8/18/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> That was merged over my objections. IMHO ksize(NULL) should fail since we
> are determining the size of an unallocated object.

Agreed, especially as we have real zero-sized objects returned from
kmalloc() et al now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/