[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708192242.43819.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:42:43 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption
Hi,
On Sunday, 19 August 2007 15:32, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi all, hi Rafael,
>
> Running kernel 2.6.23-rc3-git1, I noticed yesterday that my CPU (AMD
> Sempron 2600+) was running at a much lower temperature when
> CONFIG_SUSPEND was enabled.
Hm, interesting.
> The temperature difference was quite significant, about 6 degrees Celsius at
> idle. Measuring the power consumption of my system confirmed that the energy
> savings were real: with CONFIG_SUSPEND=n, the system consumes 80 W of power
> (idle), while with CONFIG_SUSPEND=y, the system consumes only 69 W (idle)!
> Can anyone explain how this works?
I can't.
> I didn't expect CONFIG_SUSPEND to make any difference before actually
> switching the system to standby or suspend state.
Yes, that's the expected behavior.
> I tried the same trick on two Intel motherboards I use for testing, but
> this option didn't seem to make any difference in the power consumption
> for these.
Do you have CONFIG_HIBERNATION set? If not, please see if setting it instead
of CONFIG_SUSPEND leads to the same result on the affected box (ie. running
at lower temperatures).
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists