[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1187483578.4200.51.camel@localhost>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:32:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 13:35 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> $ show_subsystem drivers/bluetooth/bpa10x.c
> BLUETOOTH
"what's a subsystem"?
I'm not sure there is an appropriate definition.
If there is an appropriate definition, why
should anyone care what subsystem a particular
file is in?
> 1) it reduces the MAINTAINERS file back to what it should be in the
> first place -- a simple reference list of each kernel subsystem, and
> who's responsible for it, so that constant reshuffling of files or
> directories in a particular subsystem doesn't require constant
> updating of the MAINTAINERS file.
I'd still be happy if MAINTAINERS went away.
I'm not sure what good it does other than have
a link to mailing lists that otherwise might not
be CC'd on patches.
> thoughts?
For user submission of bug reports, perhaps it'd be
more useful to have a submitkernelbugreport script
and a network enabled "dispatch bug report" to
appropriate maintainers service.
Try something out and see what happens.
Good luck. Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists